Practice Guide: Improving Nitrogen Cycling and Efficiency

PART OF A SERIES OF PRACTICE GUIDES TO USE AS PART OF YOUR REGENERATIVE CROPPING TOOLSET   |   LAST UPDATED: JUNE 2025

Overview

This improving nitrogen cycling and efficiency practice guide explores strategies to enhance crop health and soil resilience by optimizing nitrogen use.

It explores a range of practical strategies on how to manage nitrogen for improved crop health and resilience, enhanced soil health and reduced reliance on costly inputs. It includes practical examples from three farmers from diverse Australian cropping enterprises in Queensland and New South Wales, covering practices to: 

  • Optimise nitrogen applications and reduce losses
  • Build soil health and biological nitrogen cycling.
Before trying a new practice, it is important to consider your unique context and goals. What are you trying to achieve? Nutrient management is an important part of produce quality, yields and profitability, which makes it important to manage any changes in your practices with care. Keep in mind that how you go about improving nitrogen cycling and efficiency will hinge on your soil type, climate, overall soil health and previous management. Soil and landscape ecosystems are complex, and no two farming systems are the same – what worked for one farmer may not work for you. So consider starting small, monitoring the results and allowing some room for trial and error. There is no silver bullet when it comes to addressing soil health, so think about which strategies or combinations of other practices may be suitable to support what you’re doing.
Important: This Guide is designed to provide general information only. It is not tailored to the context of any individual farm, person or business, and does not constitute advice. Before using the information, you should carefully evaluate its accuracy, currency, completeness and relevance for your purposes, and consider seeking advice from appropriate professionals who have taken into account your individual circumstances and objectives. As a nonprofit dedicated to supporting farmers, we work hard to ensure our information is useful and accurate. However, Soils for Life accepts no liability arising from any use or release of information in, or referred to in or linked to this guide, or any error, inaccuracy or omission.

How nitrogen works in your soil

Nitrogen is essential to life and nitrogen cycling supports healthier plants at lower cost.

Nitrogen is essential for everything from microbes to plants to grow. Understanding the nitrogen cycle is a good starting point for making nitrogen decisions on farm.1Note that the complexity of nitrogen cycling in soil is still being fully understood. Keep an eye out for ongoing research that will help explain more of how soil, organic matter and soil biology cycle nitrogen.  

Nitrogen isn’t just one thing, it comes in many different forms. Some forms can be easily lost through leaching or volatilisation, especially when there is excess nitrogen. These losses can cut into profits and cause environmental impacts.2W Steffen, K Richardson, J Rockström, SE Cornell, I Fetzer, EM Bennett, R Biggs, SR Carpenter, W de Vries, CA de Wit, C Folke, D Gerten, J Heinke, GM Mace, LM Persson, V Ramanathan, B Reyers and S Sörlin, ‘Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet’, Science, 2015, 347(6223), doi:10.1126/science.1259855; X Zhang, EA Davidson, DL Mauzerall, TD Searchinger, P Dumas and Ye Shen, ‘Managing nitrogen for sustainable development’, Nature, 2015, 528(7580):51-59. doi:10.1038/nature15743; JN Galloway, JD Aber, JW Erisman, SP Seitzinger, RW Howarth, EB Cowling, BJ Cosby, ‘The nitrogen cascade’, Bioscience, 2003, 53(4):341-356, doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0341:TNC]2.0.CO;2; JW Erisman, MA Sutton, J Galloway, Z Klimont and W Winiwarter, ‘How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world’, Nature Geoscience, 2008, 1(10):636–639, doi:10.1038/ngeo325; BL Bodirsky, A Popp, H Lotze-Campen, JP Dietrich, S Rolinski, I Weindl, C Schmitz, C Müller, M Bonsch, F Humpenöder, A Biewald and M Stevanovic, ‘Reactive nitrogen requirements to feed the world in 2050 and potential to mitigate nitrogen pollution’, Nature communications, 2014, 5(1):3858. doi:10.1038/ncomms4858.   We’ve created a quick reference guide on the different forms and how they function in the soil and in plants.

In soil, microbes use nitrogen for food and energy. In this process, they convert it into different forms, increasing or decreasing plant-available nitrogen in the process.

Processes that increase plant-available N: 

  • Fixation: This happens when nitrogen from the air is converted into a plant available form by microbes that are either in a symbiotic relationship with legumes or are free living in the soil.
  • Mineralisation and depolymerisation: This happens when microbes break down soil organic matter, releasing simpler forms of nitrogen, like ammonium. 
  • Nitrification: This occurs when microbes convert ammonium into nitrate, a highly plant-available (but also leachable) form of nitrogen.

Processes that decrease plant-available N: 

  • Denitrification: When nitrate is converted back into gases that are released into the air, usually in waterlogged soils.
  • Immobilisation: When soil microbes take up nitrogen for their own growth, making it temporarily unavailable to plants.  

Modern agriculture has focused on supplying crop nitrogen needs with simple, highly available forms of nitrogen fertiliser, like ammonium and nitrate. It’s estimated that only about 50% of the nitrogen fertiliser applied is actually taken up by the crop that season.3Broadacre crops in Australia are estimated to use only about 50% of nitrogen applied within a season. There’s some big knowledge gaps about what nitrogen losses happen in cropping regions in Australia. Grains Research & Development Corporation, ‘Predicting Nitrogen Loss: Better Data, better decisions‘, 27 April 2023, accessed 10 April 2025; R Brackin, T Näsholm, N Robinson, S Guillou, K Vinall, P Lakshmanan, S Schmidt and E Inselsbacher, ‘Nitrogen fluxes at the root-soil interface show a mismatch of nitrogen fertilizer supply and sugarcane root uptake capacity’, scientific reports, 2015, 5(1):15727, doi:10.1038/srep15727. Improving nitrogen efficiency ensures applied nitrogen actually ends up being used by the crop, reducing costs and environmental impacts.4X Zhang, EA Davidson, DL Mauzerall, TD Searchinger, P Dumas and Ye Shen, ‘Managing nitrogen for sustainable development’, Nature, 2015, 528(7580):51-59. doi:10.1038/nature15743.

Plants can also take up more complex nitrogen, like amino acids, peptides and even proteins.5S Farzadfar, JD Knight and KA Congreves, ‘Soil organic nitrogen: an overlooked but potentially significant contribution to crop nutrition’, Plant and Soil, 2021, 462(1–2):7–23, doi:10.1007/s11104-021-04860-w; C Paungfoo-Lonhienne, J Visser, TGA Lonhienne and S Schmidt, ‘Past, present and future of organic nutrients’, Plant and Soil, 2021, 359(1–2):1–18, doi:10.1007/s11104-012-1357-6; M Yan, G Pan, JM Lavallee and RT Conant, ‘Rethinking sources of nitrogen to cereal crops’, Global Change Biology, 2019, 26(1):191-199, doi:10.1111/gcb.14908; RT Conant, JM Lavallee, M Yan and G Pan, ‘Reconsidering the fate of fertilizer N: A response to Quan et al.’, Global Change Biology, 2021, 27(3):e1, doi:10.1111/gcb.15463. These organic forms tend to be more stable in the soil and may offer plants a ‘shortcut’ by providing nitrogen in forms they already use to build biomass, yield and other plant functions.6This ‘carbon bonus’ of plants absorbing organic nitrogen is described as an efficient use of plant energy and could improve nitrogen use efficiency. Note that this study is based on tree species: O Franklin, CA Cambui, L Gruffman, S Palmroth, R Oren and T Näsholm, ‘The carbon bonus of organic nitrogen enhances nitrogen use efficiency of plants’, Plant, Cell & Environment, 2017, 40(1):25-35, doi:10.1111/pce.12772. Nitrogen cycling and efficiency7There are many ways to gauge ‘efficiency’ of nitrogen management, such as Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) and lots of debate about what NUE indicator is the best to use. It’s important to consider the biological complexity and timeframes of nitrogen cycling when assessing NUE: DL Antille and PW Moody, ‘Nitrogen use efficiency indicators for the Australian cotton, grains, sugar, dairy and horticulture industries’, Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 2021, 10(100099), doi:10.1016/j.indic.2020.100099; KA Congreves, O Otchere, D Ferland, S Farzadfar, S Williams and MM Arcand, ‘Nitrogen use efficiency definitions of today and tomorrow’, Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12:637108, doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.637108. can be improved by managing for healthy, biologically active soils, where fertility is supported by natural processes as well as optimised use of nitrogen inputs.

Farmers improving nitrogen cycling and efficiency

This guide includes examples from three Australian farmers throughout, showing their approach to nitrogen management in different farming systems.

Michael Waring farms sugarcane in the Herbert Valley in North Queensland. After starting out as a sugarcane agronomist, he took over the family farm in 2000.

It was visiting other cane farms in Mackay in 2007 and grain farms in Central Queensland that had adopted controlled traffic that got Michael thinking about changing his own practices. Controlled traffic and moving to wider row spacing made sense to him because it cut down on tractor hours and reduced soil compaction. This led to an interest in multispecies cover cropping and soil health. Since then, Michael has been one of the driving forces behind the Regenerative Cane Farming Network, a group of cane growers who want to learn about and share regenerative farming practices.

Michael’s nitrogen use is well below the sugarcane industry’s allowable limits,8Sugarcane is one of the industries in Australia where nitrogen use is regulated by law in an effort to reduce nutrient runoff to surrounding ecosystems. and his focus on diverse multispecies cover cropping has meant that he has almost eliminated the need for nitrogen fertilisers at planting. This has significantly lowered his costs with no changes in yield. Michael times the termination of these cover crops as close as possible to planting cane to make efficient use of the nitrogen supplied by the cover crop and to reduce the chance of nitrogen losses in his fast-cycling tropical soils.

Location: Warrgamay Country
Herbert Valley, QLD
Regional Climate: Hot humid summer/wet tropics
Average Annual Rainfall: 2,000 mm
Property Size: 140 ha
Elevation: 25–35 m
Social Structure: Family farm
Enterprise Type: Sugarcane
Nitrogen Management Strategies: Multispecies cover crops with legumes, reduced synthetic fertiliser
Soils: Highly variable from sandy soils to heavy clays including Dermosols, Kandosols and some Sodosols

Matt and Belinda McKinley have been cropping for 30 years alongside Matt’s parents on their family farm near Coolamon, New South Wales. Matt’s parents are still involved in the farm and the business, and their ‘presence and wisdom’ continues to have a strong influence.

Around 10 years ago, the McKinleys gained a deeper understanding of the importance of farming in a more ‘ecologically sustainable’ way and began a journey focused on soil health by reducing synthetic inputs. They’ve learned a lot during this journey and say one of the key lessons has been the importance of balance. They realised there is no ‘silver bullet’ when it comes to a biological approach to farming. The McKinleys are working towards achieving a balance between ‘growing our natural capital and the ecological capital of the farm…and making sure the business capital is growing’ as well. 

For the McKinleys, nitrogen is an ‘important driver’ of productivity and an area they have invested significant thought and effort into refining. They now employ carefully planned crop rotations, cover crops, holistic soil health management and well-timed inputs to ensure nitrogen use efficiency and maximise productivity. Instead of asking how much nitrogen they need to apply to achieve their desired yields, they now ask how little they can apply. They see nitrogen cycling as just one of many cycles occurring in the paddock and just one of the areas they focus on as part of a holistic approach.

Location: Wiradjuri Country, Coolamon, NSW
Regional Climate: Warm summer, cold winter/temperate sub-humid
Average Annual Rainfall: 450 mm
Property Size: Medium-large scale cropping farm
Elevation: 240–250 m
Social Structure: Family farm
Enterprise Type: Dryland broadacre cropping of wheat, canola, barley, oats and pulses
Nitrogen Management Strategies: Crop rotation including legumes, biological inputs
Soils: Light red soils with red granite parent material, primarily Chromosols

Matthew and Nevitta Marshall are fifth-generation farmers at Crescent Nine Pastoral in central Queensland. Along with Matthew’s parents, they grow grain, livestock and hay. Synthetic fertilisers had been used extensively on their farm since the 1990s and the Marshalls had started to notice that soil health was going down, indicated by low infiltration rates and organic carbon levels, as well as a ‘dive in yields’. Always someone to ‘think outside the square a bit’, Matthew started to see chemical inputs as ‘walking into the wind’ instead of working with nature. So beginning in 2015, they transitioned the farm into organic certification in just two and a half years.

Initially the Marshalls used chicken manure pellet compost as their organic supply of nutrients to crops, but have since set up a large system for brewing liquid biofertilisers at scale, making up to 100,000 L per year. Even with the biofertilisers, they knew they were still short of some nitrogen, so they introduced multispecies cover cropping. The Marshalls use mixes of 15 species, including a variety of legumes, to fuel the biological cycling of their soils, feed livestock and prepare ground for cropping.

Location: Gayiri Country, Springsure, QLD
Regional Climate: Hot dry summer, cold winter/sub-tropical sub-humid
Average Annual Rainfall:  400-460 mm
Property Size: 5,725 ha
Elevation: 280 m
Social Structure: Family farm
Enterprise Type: Organically managed Angus x Limousin cattle breeders, ~1,000 ha of cropping and lucerne hay (mostly dryland with some irrigation)
Nitrogen Management Strategies: Multispecies cover cropping, biofertiliser inputs 
Soils: Heavy black, ‘Brigalow’ clay Vertosols and also some Sodosols

What are the benefits?

Optimise crop growth while reducing negative impacts of excess nitrogen on profitability, crop resilience and soil and landscape health.

Improved crop health and resilience: Depending on the crop, excess nitrogen can extend vegetative growth, delaying maturity and affecting quality and production of sugar and proteins, or favour protein production at the expense of oil production in oil crops like canola.9J Smith and J Welsh, ‘NUTRIpak’, 2018, Cotton Research and Development Corporation, accessed 23 October 2024; Incitec Pivot Fertilisers, AGRITOPIC NITROGEN [PDF], Incitec Pivot Fertilisers, 2024, accessed 2 May 2025. ‘Rank’ growth can happen when plants become overly lush and fall over. High nitrogen levels in the crop can also attract insect pests and increase the risk of disease outbreaks.10Y Sun, M Wang, LAJ Mur, Q Shen and S Guo, ‘Unravelling the roles of nitrogen nutrition in plant disease defences’, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2020, 21(2):572, doi:10.3390/ijms21020572; G Sait, The Sad Story of Nitrogen… But There Can Be a Happy Ending (Part 1), Nutri-Tech Solutions website, 2018, accessed 17 February 2025.

Soil and landscape health: Excess nitrogen in the soil can degrade soil health, especially through acidification and salinity.11EK Bünemann, GD Schwenke and L Van Zwieten, ‘Impact of agricultural inputs on soil organisms—a review’, Soil Research, 2006, 44(4):379-406, doi:10.1071/SR05125; HN Pahalvi, L Rafiya, S Rashid, B Nisar, AN Kamili, ‘Chemical Fertilizers and Their Impact on Soil Health’, in GH Dar, RA Bhat, MA Mehmood and KR Hakeem (eds) Microbiota and Biofertilizers Vol 2, Springer, 2021, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61010-4_1; MA Sutton, A Bleeker, CM Howard, JW Erisman, YP Abrol, M Bekunda, A Datta , E Davidson, W de Vries, O Oenema, FS Zhang, Our nutrient world. The challenge to produce more food & energy with less pollution, Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Edinburgh, 2013; NS Bolan, MJ Hedley and RE White, ‘Processes of soil acidification during nitrogen cycling with emphasis on legume based pastures’, Plant and Soil, 1991, 134(1):53–63, doi:10.1007/bf00010717. Nitrogen-fixing soil microbes can also be suppressed by excess nitrogen fertilisers, effectively replacing this free source of nitrogen with a purchased source.12GG Vadakattu and J Paterson, ‘Free-living bacteria lift soil nitrogen supply’, Farming Ahead, February 2006, accessed 3 September 2024.  

Reduced GHG emissions: Excess nitrogen, especially from synthetic fertiliser application, is prone to oxidising and escaping into the atmosphere in the form of nitrous oxide, a potent greenhouse gas. Optimising and minimising synthetic inputs can minimise farm emissions and help you prepare for potential supply chain opportunities, participation in carbon or other environmental markets and the possibility of regulation.

For the McKinleys, cutting back on synthetic nitrogen helps protect the soil health and biology they’ve worked hard to build. Matt describes nitrogen as a ‘powerful weapon’ that can be ‘dangerous’ if overused, as it can damage soil health and undo the progress they’ve made on their soil ecology. While synthetic nitrogen fertiliser can lead to impressive crop growth, Matt warns it can become ‘addictive’ and cause long-term soil and plant resilience issues.

Michael Waring has found that using cover crops before planting sugarcane saves money and helps spread nutrients more evenly through the soil over time. Excess nitrogen in sugarcane can lower sugar content, which impacts payments in the sugar industry. Michael knows that synthetic nitrogen can acidify the soil and is aware of industry data showing that only around half applied nitrogen is actually used by the crop. So, finding the right balance of nitrogen is key, which is why he reduces his applications by about 10 kg N/ha at a time to find the sweet spot between production and cost savings.

The Marshalls see benefit from having created a farming system that avoids synthetic inputs and focuses on diverse enterprises that build soil biology to unlock nitrogen and other nutrients.

How to improve nitrogen cycling and efficiency

Build the foundations of good soil health and crop diversity, and fine-tune input decisions for improved nitrogen management.

Multiple strategies are needed to improve nitrogen cycling and efficiency in a way that supports reduced fertiliser inputs. Many practices that support soil health will also drive nitrogen cycling and not all of these are covered in this guide (see our other practice guides). Instead, we focus on common strategies known to be particularly effective in improving nitrogen cycling and efficiency, including strategies to:

  • Optimise nitrogen applications and reduce losses
  • Build soil health and biological nitrogen cycling.   

Michael Waring recommends taking ‘small steps’ when making changes to your nitrogen management. He’s heard from a number of other farmers that optimising nitrogen applications can take a year or two to show potential effects on crops, so it’s important to proceed carefully and monitor as you go. 

How your climate and soils influence nitrogen cycling

Climate and seasonal impacts: Soil microbes drive many nitrogen processes, and their activity changes with weather and soil moisture.

  • Wet conditions may speed up denitrification and increase the risk of nitrogen losses through leaching or gassing off.
  • Dry conditions slow microbial activity and nitrogen cycling, reducing nitrogen availability to plants.

The role of climate is clear when comparing how the McKinleys and Michael Waring manage nitrogen. In their temperate and often dry climate in NSW, the McKinleys can bank on some applied nitrogen being available for the next crop rotation. In tropical North Queensland, Michael must carefully time cover crop termination and cane planting to prevent losing nitrogen gained from the cover crop to heavy rainfall. 

Soil texture: Soil’s mix of sand, silt, and clay affects how nutrients, water and air cycle through it. 

  • Light soils (like sandy loams) drain quickly, hold fewer nutrients and may have slower nitrogen cycling due to lower microbial activity.
  • Heavy soils (like clays) retain nutrients longer due to higher cation exchange capacity (CEC), but can compact and hold onto moisture, reducing oxygen for microbes and accelerating denitrification.

There’s no ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ soil texture – the key is knowing your soil and working with it. You can use simple in-paddock tests like ‘ribboning‘, soil testing and local soil maps to understand your soils. While texture is largely fixed, you can improve soil structure and organic matter to support better nitrogen cycling and nutrient retention. The McKinleys have seen that in extended wet periods, light soil textures can leach nitrogen deeper into the soil and out of reach of young crops. They also take into account the potential nitrogen loss from denitrification when areas of heavy clays get waterlogged.

Image 5. Michael Waring’s sugarcane farm near Ingham, QLD, where nitrogen management and efficiency is focused on careful timing between application of inputs and incorporating legumes to match crop nitrogen demand. Source: Michael Waring.

Strategies to optimise nitrogen applications and reduce losses

Strategies include: 

  • Matching input rates to crop needs with monitoring
  • Using foliar nitrogen for targeted applications
  • Adding carbon to applied nitrogen   
  • Reducing nitrogen loss pathways in the landscape.

Match input rates to crop needs with monitoring

Monitoring plants and soil can give a real-time snapshot of your crop’s nitrogen demand and what’s already available in the soil. This helps avoid over-application, improve nitrogen efficiency and save money. Keep in mind that nitrogen availability will likely vary across the farm depending on soil types and paddock history.

  • Pre-season soil testing: Pre-sowing soil tests show the pool of available nitrogen at sowing. As the season progresses, nitrogen will continue to cycle and mineralise, so pre-season tests are only a snapshot, not a guide, to a full-season nitrogen budget. Tests are usually taken from the top 10 cm of soil. Laboratories can measure mineral nitrogen (ammonium and nitrate) and total nitrogen (including organic forms). For accurate results, keep samples cool and ensure quick turnaround between sampling and testing at the lab.
  • Deep nitrogen sampling: Testing deeper than 10 cm gives a better picture of nitrogen reserves at depth as crops extend their roots. Crops can access significant nitrogen deeper in the soil, especially if topsoils dry out. For winter crops, deep N testing is recommended before crop growth stage 31 (mid to late July).13 Grains Research & Development Corporation, Soil Testing Fact Sheet – Nitrogen soil testing for in-season fertiliser application [PDF], 2021, accessed 13 April 2025.
  • Sap and leaf tissue testing: Sap testing can provide real-time insights into nitrogen uptake during the growing season.14MF Padilla, M Farneselli, G Gianquinto, F Tei and RB Thompson, ‘Monitoring nitrogen status of vegetable crops and soils for optimal nitrogen management’, Agricultural Water Management, 2020, 241:106356, doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106356. Some broadacre growers now use sap tests to guide in-season foliar and soil nitrogen applications. Consistent sampling is critical, including leaf choice, timing, sample handling and lab processing. Avoid sampling during water stress, as it can throw off results.
  • Harvest grain protein levels: Taking stock of grain protein levels post-harvest can be a useful way to gauge the success of the season’s nitrogen management. Industry standards aim for nitrogen and crop management that can produce 11.5–12.5% wheat protein.15Grains Research & Development Corporation, ‘GRDC GROWNOTES, WHEAT Southern Region – Nutrition and fertiliser’, 2016, accessed 7 April 2025.  

 

The McKinleys use plant and soil monitoring to understand patterns going on in the paddock and to inform their own observations and intuition when making nitrogen management decisions. Matt has used extensive sap testing to monitor nitrogen levels and get a ‘good snapshot of where the plant is at, at the time’. He gets nitrate, ammonium and total nitrogen results from the sap tests to understand if organic forms of nitrogen are being used by the crop. 

The McKinleys also did deep soil nitrogen testing in the past to help them get a better idea of how nitrogen was distributed in the soil profile, which was especially helpful after a wet summer. Matt suggests monitoring both inorganic (i.e. nitrate and ammonium) and organic forms of nitrogen so you can build a complete picture of nitrogen availability. 

Michael Waring suggests using leaf tissue sampling to make sure your crops have adequate nitrogen levels. He compares his own leaf tissue nitrogen results with district averages provided by the local mill to account for season to season changes.

Find out more on plant testing: 

Image 6. Michael Waring’s young sugarcane crop, which he monitors using leaf tissue testing to see if the crop has sufficient nitrogen. Source: Michael Waring. 

Use foliar nitrogen for targeted applications

Foliar applications can be an effective way to supply nitrogen directly to the plant during key growth stages. This method helps improve grain quality and can support yield when soil nitrogen levels are insufficient or when environmental conditions limit root uptake. Timing and proper application rates are key to maximising benefits without overloading the plant with excess nitrogen.

The McKinleys find that foliar nitrogen applications late in the season help boost yield and grain protein levels. Matt stresses that foliar nitrogen can’t completely replace nutrients sourced from the soil and should be used to complement soil fertility rather than replace it. He suggests there is a ‘right moment’ and a ‘right time’ for foliar nitrogen. They apply dissolved urea as a foliar spray at around 8 kg N/ha, not to correct deficiencies, but to increase yields late in the season without elevating nitrates in the plant that can risk frost and pest damage. 

In that later part of the season, yeah, it’s foliar for the win.’ Matt McKinley

Find out more about foliars in our Foliar Applications Practice Guide.

Image 7. The spray equipment the McKinleys use to apply foliar applications of nitrogen in the second half of the crop’s growing season. Source: Matt and Belinda McKinley.

Add carbon to applied nitrogen

Adding a carbon source to nitrogen fertilisers can help improve nitrogen efficiency and reduce losses. Carbon inputs can help stabilise nitrogen and also act as biostimulants, stimulating soil microbes and promoting nutrient cycling.16 P Espie and H Ridgway H, ‘Bioactive carbon improves nitrogen fertiliser efficiency and ecological sustainability’, Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1):3227, doi:10.1038/s41598-020-60024-3; Y Ma, X Cheng and Y Zhang, ‘The Impact of Humic Acid Fertilizers on Crop Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency: A Meta-Analysis’, Agronomy, 2024, 14(12):2763, doi:10.3390/agronomy14122763. A common approach is using products that are made from humic substances,17 Humic substances are organic compounds that are formed in the decomposition of plant, animal, and microbial residues. such as humate granules, with nitrogen fertilisers or humate coated urea products. Some farmers are also using composted manure pellets alongside nitrogen applications. 

The McKinleys add fulvic acid (a humic substance) to any foliar urea applications as a way to add carbon to a nitrogen application. They also add humates to their nitrogen nitrogen liquid inject mix applied in the furrow at planting. 

Find out more about stabilising nitrogen inputs with carbon from Joel Williams from Integrated Soils, such as this webinar on the topic of ‘What you need to know about nitrogen’.

Reduce nitrogen loss pathways in the landscape

Farms aren’t air and water-tight and nitrogen is lost through multiple pathways in soil, water and the air. These losses can be reduced through:   

  • Reviewing your irrigation scheduling and paddock drainage to reduce waterlogging (where possible) to minimise the conversion of nitrates into nitrogen gases.
  • Reducing soil erosion by maintaining ground cover and consider integrating permanent vegetation on farm (i.e. areas of diverse woody vegetation) to filter and slow overland flow and soil erosion,18PM Vitousek, N Rosamond, T Crews, MB David, LE Drinkwater, E Holland, PJ Johnes, J Katzenberger, LA Martinelli, PA Matson, G Nziguheba, D Ojima, CA Palm, GP Robertson, PA Sanchez, AR Townsend and FS Zhang, ’Nutrient imbalances in agricultural development.” Science, 2009, 324(5934):1519-1520. doi:10.1126/science.1170261. especially on slopes. 
  • Enhancing farm dams, wet areas and wetland areas to actively manage paddock runoff before it enters a local waterway. This also helps reduce greenhouse gas emissions – wetlands support the denitrification of excess nitrogen from runoff water into harmless nitrogen gas rather than nitrous oxide, which is a more potent greenhouse gas.19JN Galloway, JD Aber, JW Erisman, SP Seitzinger, RW Howarth, EB Cowling and BJ Cosby, ‘The nitrogen cascade’, Bioscience, 2003, 53(4):341-356, doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0341:TNC]2.0.CO;2; W Zhang, H Li and SG Pueppke, ‘Direct measurements of dissolved N2 and N2O highlight the strong nitrogen (N) removal potential of riverine wetlands in a headwater stream’, Science of The Total Environment, 2022, 848:157538, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157538. 

Find out more: The Nature Glenelg Trust in South Australia and the Mulloon Institute in New South Wales, who work with farmers to restore wet areas and wetlands.

Strategies to build soil health and biological nitrogen cycling

Relying more on biological nitrogen cycling, rather than only on direct inputs, requires well-structured, biologically active soil and organic matter because:

  • Organic matter stores the soil’s organic nitrogen reserves and can act as a nutrient sponge, storing nitrogen inputs longer term20 JM Lavallee, L Jennifer, M Soong and MF Cotrufo, ‘Conceptualizing soil organic matter into particulate and mineral‐associated forms to address global change in the 21st century’, Global change biology, 2020, 26(1):261-273, doi:10.1111/gcb.14859; HM Krause, P Mäder, A Fliessbach, KA Jarosch, A Oberson and J Mayer, ‘Organic cropping systems balance environmental impacts and agricultural production’, Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(1):1-15, doi:10.1038/s41598-024-76776-1; P Schjønning, JL Jensen, S Bruun, LS Jensen, BT Christensen, LJ Munkholm, M Oelofse, S Baby and L Knudsen, ‘The role of soil organic matter for maintaining crop yields: Evidence for a renewed conceptual basis’, Advances in agronomy, 2018, 150:35-79, doi:10.1016/bs.agron.2018.03.001; AB Daly, A Jilling, TM Bowles, RW Buchkowski, SD Frey, CM Kallenbach, M Keiluweit, M Mooshammer, JP Schimel and AS Grandy, ‘A holistic framework integrating plant-microbe-mineral regulation of soil bioavailable nitrogen’, Biogeochemistry, 2021, 154(2):211–229, doi:10.1007/s10533-021-00793-9.  
  • Soil structure provides housing for the soil microbes that keep soil fertility cycling by building up and mineralising organic matter for steady nitrogen release21M Hartmann and J Six, ‘Soil structure and microbiome functions in agroecosystems’, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2023, 4(1):4-18, doi:10.1038/s43017-022-00366-w.  
  • Soil structure enables drainage, reducing waterlogging and preventing low oxygen levels that can lead to nitrogen being converted and lost as nitrogen gases.22BC Ball, ‘Soil structure and greenhouse gas emissions: a synthesis of 20 years of experimentation’, European Journal of Soil Science, 2013, 64(3):357-373, doi:10.1111/ejss.12013; J Tullberg, DL Antille, C Bluett, J Eberhard and C Scheer, ‘Controlled traffic farming effects on soil emissions of nitrous oxide and methane’, Soil and Tillage Research, 2018, 176:18-25, doi:10.1016/j.still.2017.09.014; DL Antille, WCT Chamen, JN Tullberg and R Lal, ‘The potential of controlled traffic farming to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and enhance carbon sequestration in arable land: a critical review’, Transactions of the ASABE, 2015, 58(3):707-731, doi:10.13031/trans.58.11049.  

Soil organic matter and structure can be improved by minimising soil disturbance, maintaining living roots, increasing plant diversity and keeping the ground covered. Common practices that are directly linked to improved nitrogen cycling include the following (each is discussed in more detail below):

  • Using legumes for nitrogen fixation
  • Designing crop rotations for nitrogen management
  • Biological nitrogen inputs
  • Fine-tuning nutrient inputs for nitrogen utilisation.

Nitrogen management is about everything other than nitrogen.’ Matt McKinley 

The McKinleys focus on nitrogen use efficiency by improving ‘everything other than nitrogen’ and prioritising the three pillars of soil health – biological, chemical and physical – to strengthen their entire production system. Their light, well-draining soils handle wet conditions, but moisture retention is a key concern in their dry Riverina climate, which is what initially led them to adopt no-till. In recent years, the McKinleys identified subsoil acidity as a bottleneck to their soil health and productivity, and began a deep cultivation program with lime, unlocking productivity and nitrogen use efficiency gains with better plant growth. One of Matt’s key lessons from this was that nitrogen efficiency depends on overall soil health. 

In Michael Waring’s tropical climate, managing nitrogen losses is challenging. To reduce waterlogging and nitrate loss, Michael maintains soil structure through controlled traffic, zonal and minimal tillage, and a permanent bed system. 

In recent years, the Marshalls saw signs that they had issues with their soil structure. Matthew sold all of their cultivators and machinery in one fell swoop and bought a disc planter and crimp roller instead. They also moved from monocropping legumes where possible and introduced multispecies cover crops. These shifts have led to improvements in soil health and soil water infiltration.

Use legumes for nitrogen fixation

Legumes form relationships with microbes in the soil to convert nitrogen from the air into plant-available nitrogen (like ammonium, nitrate and some forms of organic nitrogen). Including legumes in your cropping rotation, multispecies cover crop, or break crops23In cereal cropping, break crops are non-cereal crops used strategically in crop rotation to reduce the buildup of weeds, diseases and pests that can affect cereal production. is a key strategy for supplying organic nitrogen to a cropping system. Bear in mind that it is possible to have too much of a good thing – for example, repetitive monocultures of legume rotations can also create excess nitrogen and may contribute to soil acidification and loss of soil structure.24 RJ Haynes, ‘Soil acidification induced by leguminous crops’, Grass and Forage Science, 1983, 38(1):1–11, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.1983.tb01614.x.  

Biological nitrogen fixation relies on plant structures and enzymes made from a variety of other nutrients. In low input systems that rely on nitrogen via biological fixation, it’s important to ensure these other nutrients are available, specifically molybdenum, iron, phosphorous and nickel. Calcium, boron, copper, cobalt are also important for nitrogen fixation by legumes.25GW O’hara, N Boonkerd and MJ Dilworth, ‘Mineral constraints to nitrogen fixation’, Plant and Soil, 1988, 108(1)93–110, doi.org/10.1007/BF02370104; W Weisany, Y Raei and KH Allahverdipoor, ‘Role of Some of Mineral Nutrients in Biological Nitrogen Fixation’, Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences, 2013, 2(4):77-84. This varies depending on soil type and existing nutrient stocks, so it is important to keep monitoring soil over time and to use inputs strategically to remedy deficiencies that could impact nitrogen cycling.26M Reimer, TE Hartmann, M Oelofse, J Magid, EK Bünemann and K Möller, ‘Reliance on biological nitrogen fixation depletes soil phosphorus and potassium reserves’, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2020, 118(3):273-291, doi:10.1007/s10705-020-10101-w.

Image 8. Nodulation on a legume plant at the McKinleys’ farm. Nodules on legume roots are where the plant hosts nitrogen fixing bacteria to biologically fix nitrogen from the air Source: Matt and Belinda McKinley.

The Marshalls use legumes like lab lab, clovers, mung beans, cow peas and vetch in their summer cover crop mix to supply nitrogen, adjusting the mix based on seasonal conditions. They avoid planting monocultures whenever they can, even of legumes. Matthew feels that legumes will contribute the most organic nitrogen to the soil if they’re also planted with diversity. Other non-legume plants that ‘mop up’ excess nitrogen in a multispecies cover crop, like oats, make the legumes more efficient at fixing nitrogen. 

Matthew uses a roller crimper and livestock to terminate and manage cover crops between grain growing seasons. He has recently started pre-spraying on a carbon rich liquid product ahead of roller crimping cover crops to raise the C:N ratio, which slows the breakdown of the residues, effectively keeping the soil covered for longer. 

No plant likes to live with the same plant beside it…They like the diversity…They just thrive from that.’ Matthew Marshall 

For the McKinleys, the legume crops are the start of their crop rotation and key to ‘driving the system’ and maintaining nitrogen availability. They find that legumes build up the supply of organic nitrogen in the soil, which takes the ‘peaks and troughs’ out of crops’ responses to inputs later in the crop rotation (i.e. they see a more consistent response). They favour lupins, peas, legumes and beans for the nitrogen legacy they leave behind. Matt also keeps an eye on molybdenum and boron levels during the legume rotations, as they are crucial for the nodulation that legumes need to fix nitrogen out of the air.

Michael Waring uses a mix of legume multispecies cover crops, including soybeans, sun hemp, sunflower and cowpeas, to return organic matter and nitrogen to the soil, while boosting system diversity during fallow periods. He typically terminates the cover crop chemically within 10 to 12 weeks and incorporates it into the soil within two weeks of planting to keep nitrogen availability as high as possible to the new sugarcane crop.

Images 9-12. Soybeans, sun hemp, sunflower and cowpeas growing in a healthy multispecies cover crop at Michael Waring’s farm. The legumes (soybeans, sun hemp and cowpeas) are chosen to build soil nitrogen. Image 12 shows the cover crop once it has been terminated with herbicides. Source: Michael Waring.

Find out more: Check out our Multispecies Cropping Practice Guide for more information on multispecies cover cropping. 

Design crop rotations for nitrogen management

In addition to including legumes in crop rotations, the design of overall crop rotations can also support improved nitrogen efficiency and cycling. For example, canola can leave more mineral nitrogen in the soil than a wheat crop, which is then available for the next crop rotation.27MH Ryan, JA Kirkegaard and JF Angus, ‘Brassica crops stimulate soil mineral N accumulation’, Soil Research, 2006, 44(4):367–377, doi:10.1071/sr05143. Pasture phases, especially those with clovers and perennial grasses, can also boost soil nitrogen supply for subsequent crops.28 JF Angus, TP Bolger, JA Kirkegaard and MB Peoples, ’Nitrogen mineralisation in relation to previous crops and pastures’, Soil Research, 2006, 44(4):355–365, doi:10.1071/sr05138.

The McKinleys manage nitrogen availability through a carefully planned crop rotation. They generally follow a four-year rotation that cycles through (in order) legumes (faba beans or lupins), canola, wheat, and barley.

They designed this rotation with the aim of maintaining a steady level of nitrogen in the soil and stubble groundcover. Matt aims to never apply more than ~20 kg N/ha of additional nitrogen fertiliser at a time to avoid a ‘nitrate bulge’, focusing instead on supporting ammonium uptake rather than relying on nitrates. They follow legumes with canola, a high nitrogen user that’s less affected by excess nitrogen. The canola rotation also provides a break that helps manage cereal disease pressure. A small amount of nitrogen is applied to the canola and then banked for use by following grain crops, which then require little or no urea. This helps avoid excess plant nitrate levels and reduces the risk of pests and disease. Barley comes last in the rotation due to its high nitrogen use efficiency and tolerance for low nitrogen.

The Marshalls use cover crop mixes of 7–15 species from at least four plant families, always including legumes, to enhance diversity and nitrogen cycling in their mixed enterprise. Cover crops help prepare soil for grain crops and supply nitrogen. In their dry, hot climate, the flexibility of cover crops allows them to adapt to seasonal changes. If cash crops aren’t possible, cover crops can still provide groundcover and be used for livestock feed or hay.

Use biological nitrogen inputs

Biological or recycled sources of nitrogen can replace some or all of your existing synthetic nitrogen inputs, depending on your goals. The amount of nitrogen in biological inputs like composts can be measured with lab tests, though many biological inputs won’t have the same concentration of nitrogen as synthetic alternatives. Other non-synthetic products are being developed such as fertiliser made from microbial biomass, which tends to have a higher nitrogen content than other organically sourced alternative fertilisers. Biological inputs can have the added benefit of providing a longer term source of nutrients and often other soil health and biostimulant effects on crops.

Check out our Biological Inputs and Fertilisers Practice Guide for more information on potential alternatives to some synthetic inputs, such as biostimulants, microbial inoculants and inputs rich in organic matter.

The Marshalls use biofertilisers as their main input. They produce up to 100,000 L of biofertilisers per year on farm and use this along with diverse multispecies cover crops (including legumes) to supply crop nitrogen needs.

Alongside more traditional inputs like urea, the McKinleys also use biostimulants like fish, kelp and humate products, as well as an anaerobic microbial inoculant, to support soil nutrient cycling and plant function. They feel that these work synergistically to improve nitrogen efficiency and bring down their nitrogen input needs. Matt recommends getting clear on how much nitrogen is actually in biological inputs, being careful to not end up with nitrogen deficiencies and risk losing out on income by trying to cut all synthetic inputs. 

Michael Waring has started using a biological inoculant product that improves the phosphorus availability in the soil and, as an added benefit, also supports nitrogen uptake. He’s ‘done the maths’ and the fertiliser savings makes the biological liquid amendment a worthwhile investment.

The balance between carbon and nitrogen in the soil, known as the C:N ratio, influences how microbes cycle nutrients. The C:N ration in inputs or residues affects whether the nitrogen is likely to be released for plant use (mineralisation) or tied up by microbes (immobilisation).29 LC Breza and AS Grandy, ‘Organic amendments tighten nitrogen cycling in agricultural soils: a meta-analysis on gross nitrogen flux’, Frontiers in Agronomy, 2025, 7:1472749, doi:10.3389/fagro.2025.1472749. 

  • Inputs/residues with a low C:N ratio (<15:1) promote mineralisation, making nitrogen quickly available to plants.
  • Inputs/residues with a high C:N ratio (above 35:1) encourage immobilisation, making nitrogen temporarily unavailable.
  • A balanced C:N ratio of around 20–30:1 helps maintain a steady release of nitrogen.30 SR Morey-Yagi, Y Kinoshita, K Motoki, Y Iwahashi, D D Hanh, S Kato, R Nakano, K Ochiai, M Kobayashi, T Nakazaki and K Numata, ‘Utilization of lysed and dried bacterial biomass from the marine purple photosynthetic bacterium Rhodovulum sulfidophilum as a sustainable nitrogen fertilizer for plant production’, Sustainable Agriculture, 2024, 2(1):10, doi:10.1038/s44264-024-00018-0.

The McKinleys manage their C:N ratio through their crop rotation by keeping an eye on the visual organic matter on the soil surface, which they call ‘soil armour’. If there is a lack of groundcover, they will alter their rotation to be more cereal dominant and build carbon at the soil surface by switching the canola rotation for a second cereal crop. When there’s a lot of stubble that isn’t breaking down, they find a year or two of legume crops are enough to shift the C:N ratio, which helps break down and incorporate the high-carbon stubble.

Image 13. The McKinleys maintain a thick layer of stubble for soil surface protection. They make sure to plant legumes to provide the nitrogen that will fuel soil microbes to break down the high carbon stubble as a way to manage their C:N ratio. Source: Matt and Belinda McKinley.

Fine-tune nutrients for nitrogen utilisation

After plants absorb nitrogen, they rely on internal processes and enzymes to move and utilise it to build plant proteins. Many of these processes depend on specific nutrients. Making sure nutrients are available in the soil or, in the case of micronutrients, topping them up with foliar applications can help fine-tune nitrogen efficiency even further. Soil and plant educator, Joel Williams from Integrated Soils, recommends ensuring sufficient levels of molybdenum, sulphur, phosphorous, potassium, manganese, magnesium, iron, boron, zinc and nickel as these are important for a plant’s ability to use nitrogen.

The McKinleys regularly apply targeted micronutrients chelated with citric acid via foliar applications to enhance the crop’s ability to utilise nitrogen. They also apply dissolved urea as a foliar, generally adding magnesium and molybdenum to support nitrogen use efficiency in the plant. 

At planting, they’ve also found applying targeted micronutrients in their liquid inject system to be a ‘turning point’ for their overall soil health and plant resilience. This includes small amounts of manganese, iron and zinc for a cereal crop and molybdenum and boron for legumes to support nodulation.

Finances

Managing nitrogen is a balancing act. High rates of synthetic nitrogen can degrade soil function long term, reducing soil organic matter and causing acidification, which can have a long-term impact on a farm’s resource base.31RL Mulvaney, SA Khan and TR Ellsworth, ‘Synthetic Nitrogen Fertilizers Deplete Soil Nitrogen: A Global Dilemma for Sustainable Cereal Production’, Journal of Environmental Quality, 2009, 38(6):2295–2314, doi:10.2134/jeq2008.0527. Yet not getting nitrogen supply to the crop right can compromise yields and profit. Adding to these challenges, nitrogen prices are often volatile, making decisions around its use and expected outcomes increasingly uncertain. It’s no wonder nitrogen management is complex and at times contentious. 

Consider profitability and farming goals: By using holistic, integrated nutrient and soil management practices, some find that improved soil health and profitability can be achieved alongside reduced reliance on synthetic nitrogen fertilisers. Depending on your context however, it is possible to experience reduced productivity with reduced synthetic inputs. Defining what success looks like for your farm can help determine which tweaks to your nitrogen management strategy are best for you.

The McKinleys find that their resilient, low-input system can work well in tough climatic conditions, but that they have missed some potential in a few of the ‘good years’. There was a period where they lost out on some of their financial goals when trying a very minimal approach to synthetic inputs during more favourable seasons. Matt notes that ‘getting nitrogen management wrong can be very costly to productivity’. Even after reintroducing a very small amount of synthetic nitrogen use into their crop rotation, the McKinleys estimate that their nitrogen costs are less than half of the industry average. While keeping the variable inputs costs down is a benefit, they note that there’s also some big overhead and capital investments that can come with improving soil health, like the purchase of a stripper front and disc seeder to maintain a high residue system and groundcover.

Matt advises other farmers to regularly evaluate their strategies, balance ideal practices with business goals and adjust as needed. 

For the Marshalls, using cover crops and biofertilisers as their main fertility driver provides flexibility and profitability, outweighing the risks of not having synthetic nitrogen available in their certified organic system.

Michael Waring has found he can grow similar yields of cane with his reduced nitrogen applications, and the cost savings are significant. 

I grow the same cane but it costs me a lot less to do it.’ Michael Waring 

Cane farmers get paid both on the plant yield and the sugar content of their cane. This makes nitrogen management particularly front of mind because excess nitrogen can have a dampening effect on sugar production, keeping the plant in a vegetative growth stage instead of maturing and increasing the sugar content. In recent years, Michael has noticed that his sugar content results are dropping slightly below the mill averages in the region. He’s curious whether the improvements to his soil health, given his tropical climate, have led to such efficient nitrogen cycling that he may now have an excess of nitrogen. He’s experimenting with dropping his nitrogen rates even further each year by about 10 kg/ha to strike the right balance.

Indicators of success

Profitability and productivity: Tracking nitrogen input costs and yields can help make sense of tweaks made to nitrogen management year to year. Success for the McKinleys, the Marshalls and Michael Waring has looked like sustained cropping yields across both good and tough seasons, plus improvements in long-term business resilience due to improved nitrogen cycling and efficiency.

Image 14. Matt McKinley examines a wheat crop, which he tests for protein levels to track the success of their nitrogen management. Source: Matt and Belinda McKinley.

‘Don’t be frightened to try. Don’t do your whole farm…Try it for a couple of years, not one year. You can grow cane without truckloads of nitrogen.’ Michael Waring 

For the McKinleys, plant health observations and yield outcomes are their main indicators of success when it comes to tracking how their nitrogen management is impacting their bottom line. Grain protein level is another indicator they use to track the success of their nitrogen management.

Improved soil and landscape health outcomes: Look out for soil health indicators (especially physical and biological soil health) to show that the foundations have been laid for improved nitrogen cycling and efficiency. Check out our Soil Health Assessment Guide for easy ways to track soil health. It can be tricky to track nitrogen losses into waterways and the air from the paddock, but consider teaming up with your local Landcare, NRM or catchment group to better understand your landscape health. 

The Marshalls have seen total carbon levels in one particular paddock go from between 1.2–1.4% to 7% over seven years. They put this down to their improvement in input management, diverse multispecies mixes as well as the soil health benefits that come with grazing.

Image 15. The McKinleys observe cereal plant roots with rhizosheaths. Plant and soil observations are an important part of managing nitrogen and general soil fertility on their farm. Source: Grassroots Agronomy.
Image 16. Inspecting the soil and root system of a faba bean crop at the McKinleys’ farm. Source: Matt and Belinda McKinley. 

Further learning

Hearing from and sharing with other farmers about what nitrogen management strategies have worked for them is an important part of building a holistic understanding of soil fertility. 

The McKinleys’ involvement with Vic No Till and Grassroots Agronomy connected them to a great network of people and resources, and Matt encourages others to ‘get out there, learn, travel, speak, and attend’, as everyone has a story to share. However, he advises other farmers to put any advice ‘through your own filter’ and make sure it aligns with your own business goals and context.

Michael Waring says he has gained a lot by sharing both his successes and mistakes with the Regen Cane group, and learning from others’ experiences in return. Now nearing retirement, he is looking forward to seeing others advance regenerative practices in the cane industry. 

Image 17. Peer learning, attending and hosting field days and joining farmer networks have been key to how the McKinleys have built their soil health knowledge and changed their practices over time. Source: Grassroots Agronomy.

Explore our series of practice guides

Resources and connections: 

The list below are some of the resources and people recommended by the farmers in this practice guide.

Other resources from Soils for Life

Join a discussion group
Sign up to Soils for Life’s newsletter to hear about opportunities to join a discussion group with like minded farmers. Or follow our guide to start your own.

Soils for Life Podcast
Check out our podcast interview with Joel Williams on small steps for big change in cropping.

What did you think of this guide?

Thank you for reading the practice guide! We would love to know whether you found the guide useful. Please take a minute tell us more.

How useful did you find this guide?
How likely are you now to experiment with this practice?
This project is jointly funded through the Australian Government’s Future Drought Fund and Soils for Life.
  • 1
    Note that the complexity of nitrogen cycling in soil is still being fully understood. Keep an eye out for ongoing research that will help explain more of how soil, organic matter and soil biology cycle nitrogen.
  • 2
    W Steffen, K Richardson, J Rockström, SE Cornell, I Fetzer, EM Bennett, R Biggs, SR Carpenter, W de Vries, CA de Wit, C Folke, D Gerten, J Heinke, GM Mace, LM Persson, V Ramanathan, B Reyers and S Sörlin, ‘Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet’, Science, 2015, 347(6223), doi:10.1126/science.1259855; X Zhang, EA Davidson, DL Mauzerall, TD Searchinger, P Dumas and Ye Shen, ‘Managing nitrogen for sustainable development’, Nature, 2015, 528(7580):51-59. doi:10.1038/nature15743; JN Galloway, JD Aber, JW Erisman, SP Seitzinger, RW Howarth, EB Cowling, BJ Cosby, ‘The nitrogen cascade’, Bioscience, 2003, 53(4):341-356, doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0341:TNC]2.0.CO;2; JW Erisman, MA Sutton, J Galloway, Z Klimont and W Winiwarter, ‘How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world’, Nature Geoscience, 2008, 1(10):636–639, doi:10.1038/ngeo325; BL Bodirsky, A Popp, H Lotze-Campen, JP Dietrich, S Rolinski, I Weindl, C Schmitz, C Müller, M Bonsch, F Humpenöder, A Biewald and M Stevanovic, ‘Reactive nitrogen requirements to feed the world in 2050 and potential to mitigate nitrogen pollution’, Nature communications, 2014, 5(1):3858. doi:10.1038/ncomms4858.
  • 3
    Broadacre crops in Australia are estimated to use only about 50% of nitrogen applied within a season. There’s some big knowledge gaps about what nitrogen losses happen in cropping regions in Australia. Grains Research & Development Corporation, ‘Predicting Nitrogen Loss: Better Data, better decisions‘, 27 April 2023, accessed 10 April 2025; R Brackin, T Näsholm, N Robinson, S Guillou, K Vinall, P Lakshmanan, S Schmidt and E Inselsbacher, ‘Nitrogen fluxes at the root-soil interface show a mismatch of nitrogen fertilizer supply and sugarcane root uptake capacity’, scientific reports, 2015, 5(1):15727, doi:10.1038/srep15727.
  • 4
    X Zhang, EA Davidson, DL Mauzerall, TD Searchinger, P Dumas and Ye Shen, ‘Managing nitrogen for sustainable development’, Nature, 2015, 528(7580):51-59. doi:10.1038/nature15743.
  • 5
    S Farzadfar, JD Knight and KA Congreves, ‘Soil organic nitrogen: an overlooked but potentially significant contribution to crop nutrition’, Plant and Soil, 2021, 462(1–2):7–23, doi:10.1007/s11104-021-04860-w; C Paungfoo-Lonhienne, J Visser, TGA Lonhienne and S Schmidt, ‘Past, present and future of organic nutrients’, Plant and Soil, 2021, 359(1–2):1–18, doi:10.1007/s11104-012-1357-6; M Yan, G Pan, JM Lavallee and RT Conant, ‘Rethinking sources of nitrogen to cereal crops’, Global Change Biology, 2019, 26(1):191-199, doi:10.1111/gcb.14908; RT Conant, JM Lavallee, M Yan and G Pan, ‘Reconsidering the fate of fertilizer N: A response to Quan et al.’, Global Change Biology, 2021, 27(3):e1, doi:10.1111/gcb.15463.
  • 6
    This ‘carbon bonus’ of plants absorbing organic nitrogen is described as an efficient use of plant energy and could improve nitrogen use efficiency. Note that this study is based on tree species: O Franklin, CA Cambui, L Gruffman, S Palmroth, R Oren and T Näsholm, ‘The carbon bonus of organic nitrogen enhances nitrogen use efficiency of plants’, Plant, Cell & Environment, 2017, 40(1):25-35, doi:10.1111/pce.12772.
  • 7
    There are many ways to gauge ‘efficiency’ of nitrogen management, such as Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) and lots of debate about what NUE indicator is the best to use. It’s important to consider the biological complexity and timeframes of nitrogen cycling when assessing NUE: DL Antille and PW Moody, ‘Nitrogen use efficiency indicators for the Australian cotton, grains, sugar, dairy and horticulture industries’, Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 2021, 10(100099), doi:10.1016/j.indic.2020.100099; KA Congreves, O Otchere, D Ferland, S Farzadfar, S Williams and MM Arcand, ‘Nitrogen use efficiency definitions of today and tomorrow’, Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12:637108, doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.637108.
  • 8
    Sugarcane is one of the industries in Australia where nitrogen use is regulated by law in an effort to reduce nutrient runoff to surrounding ecosystems.
  • 9
    J Smith and J Welsh, ‘NUTRIpak’, 2018, Cotton Research and Development Corporation, accessed 23 October 2024; Incitec Pivot Fertilisers, AGRITOPIC NITROGEN [PDF], Incitec Pivot Fertilisers, 2024, accessed 2 May 2025.
  • 10
    Y Sun, M Wang, LAJ Mur, Q Shen and S Guo, ‘Unravelling the roles of nitrogen nutrition in plant disease defences’, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2020, 21(2):572, doi:10.3390/ijms21020572; G Sait, The Sad Story of Nitrogen… But There Can Be a Happy Ending (Part 1), Nutri-Tech Solutions website, 2018, accessed 17 February 2025.
  • 11
    EK Bünemann, GD Schwenke and L Van Zwieten, ‘Impact of agricultural inputs on soil organisms—a review’, Soil Research, 2006, 44(4):379-406, doi:10.1071/SR05125; HN Pahalvi, L Rafiya, S Rashid, B Nisar, AN Kamili, ‘Chemical Fertilizers and Their Impact on Soil Health’, in GH Dar, RA Bhat, MA Mehmood and KR Hakeem (eds) Microbiota and Biofertilizers Vol 2, Springer, 2021, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61010-4_1; MA Sutton, A Bleeker, CM Howard, JW Erisman, YP Abrol, M Bekunda, A Datta , E Davidson, W de Vries, O Oenema, FS Zhang, Our nutrient world. The challenge to produce more food & energy with less pollution, Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Edinburgh, 2013; NS Bolan, MJ Hedley and RE White, ‘Processes of soil acidification during nitrogen cycling with emphasis on legume based pastures’, Plant and Soil, 1991, 134(1):53–63, doi:10.1007/bf00010717.
  • 12
    GG Vadakattu and J Paterson, ‘Free-living bacteria lift soil nitrogen supply’, Farming Ahead, February 2006, accessed 3 September 2024.
  • 13
    Grains Research & Development Corporation, Soil Testing Fact Sheet – Nitrogen soil testing for in-season fertiliser application [PDF], 2021, accessed 13 April 2025.
  • 14
    MF Padilla, M Farneselli, G Gianquinto, F Tei and RB Thompson, ‘Monitoring nitrogen status of vegetable crops and soils for optimal nitrogen management’, Agricultural Water Management, 2020, 241:106356, doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106356.
  • 15
    Grains Research & Development Corporation, ‘GRDC GROWNOTES, WHEAT Southern Region – Nutrition and fertiliser’, 2016, accessed 7 April 2025.
  • 16
    P Espie and H Ridgway H, ‘Bioactive carbon improves nitrogen fertiliser efficiency and ecological sustainability’, Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1):3227, doi:10.1038/s41598-020-60024-3; Y Ma, X Cheng and Y Zhang, ‘The Impact of Humic Acid Fertilizers on Crop Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency: A Meta-Analysis’, Agronomy, 2024, 14(12):2763, doi:10.3390/agronomy14122763.
  • 17
    Humic substances are organic compounds that are formed in the decomposition of plant, animal, and microbial residues.
  • 18
    PM Vitousek, N Rosamond, T Crews, MB David, LE Drinkwater, E Holland, PJ Johnes, J Katzenberger, LA Martinelli, PA Matson, G Nziguheba, D Ojima, CA Palm, GP Robertson, PA Sanchez, AR Townsend and FS Zhang, ’Nutrient imbalances in agricultural development.” Science, 2009, 324(5934):1519-1520. doi:10.1126/science.1170261.
  • 19
    JN Galloway, JD Aber, JW Erisman, SP Seitzinger, RW Howarth, EB Cowling and BJ Cosby, ‘The nitrogen cascade’, Bioscience, 2003, 53(4):341-356, doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0341:TNC]2.0.CO;2; W Zhang, H Li and SG Pueppke, ‘Direct measurements of dissolved N2 and N2O highlight the strong nitrogen (N) removal potential of riverine wetlands in a headwater stream’, Science of The Total Environment, 2022, 848:157538, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157538.
  • 20
    JM Lavallee, L Jennifer, M Soong and MF Cotrufo, ‘Conceptualizing soil organic matter into particulate and mineral‐associated forms to address global change in the 21st century’, Global change biology, 2020, 26(1):261-273, doi:10.1111/gcb.14859; HM Krause, P Mäder, A Fliessbach, KA Jarosch, A Oberson and J Mayer, ‘Organic cropping systems balance environmental impacts and agricultural production’, Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(1):1-15, doi:10.1038/s41598-024-76776-1; P Schjønning, JL Jensen, S Bruun, LS Jensen, BT Christensen, LJ Munkholm, M Oelofse, S Baby and L Knudsen, ‘The role of soil organic matter for maintaining crop yields: Evidence for a renewed conceptual basis’, Advances in agronomy, 2018, 150:35-79, doi:10.1016/bs.agron.2018.03.001; AB Daly, A Jilling, TM Bowles, RW Buchkowski, SD Frey, CM Kallenbach, M Keiluweit, M Mooshammer, JP Schimel and AS Grandy, ‘A holistic framework integrating plant-microbe-mineral regulation of soil bioavailable nitrogen’, Biogeochemistry, 2021, 154(2):211–229, doi:10.1007/s10533-021-00793-9.
  • 21
    M Hartmann and J Six, ‘Soil structure and microbiome functions in agroecosystems’, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2023, 4(1):4-18, doi:10.1038/s43017-022-00366-w.
  • 22
    BC Ball, ‘Soil structure and greenhouse gas emissions: a synthesis of 20 years of experimentation’, European Journal of Soil Science, 2013, 64(3):357-373, doi:10.1111/ejss.12013; J Tullberg, DL Antille, C Bluett, J Eberhard and C Scheer, ‘Controlled traffic farming effects on soil emissions of nitrous oxide and methane’, Soil and Tillage Research, 2018, 176:18-25, doi:10.1016/j.still.2017.09.014; DL Antille, WCT Chamen, JN Tullberg and R Lal, ‘The potential of controlled traffic farming to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and enhance carbon sequestration in arable land: a critical review’, Transactions of the ASABE, 2015, 58(3):707-731, doi:10.13031/trans.58.11049.
  • 23
    In cereal cropping, break crops are non-cereal crops used strategically in crop rotation to reduce the buildup of weeds, diseases and pests that can affect cereal production.
  • 24
    RJ Haynes, ‘Soil acidification induced by leguminous crops’, Grass and Forage Science, 1983, 38(1):1–11, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.1983.tb01614.x.
  • 25
    GW O’hara, N Boonkerd and MJ Dilworth, ‘Mineral constraints to nitrogen fixation’, Plant and Soil, 1988, 108(1)93–110, doi.org/10.1007/BF02370104; W Weisany, Y Raei and KH Allahverdipoor, ‘Role of Some of Mineral Nutrients in Biological Nitrogen Fixation’, Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences, 2013, 2(4):77-84.
  • 26
    M Reimer, TE Hartmann, M Oelofse, J Magid, EK Bünemann and K Möller, ‘Reliance on biological nitrogen fixation depletes soil phosphorus and potassium reserves’, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2020, 118(3):273-291, doi:10.1007/s10705-020-10101-w.
  • 27
    MH Ryan, JA Kirkegaard and JF Angus, ‘Brassica crops stimulate soil mineral N accumulation’, Soil Research, 2006, 44(4):367–377, doi:10.1071/sr05143.
  • 28
    JF Angus, TP Bolger, JA Kirkegaard and MB Peoples, ’Nitrogen mineralisation in relation to previous crops and pastures’, Soil Research, 2006, 44(4):355–365, doi:10.1071/sr05138.
  • 29
    LC Breza and AS Grandy, ‘Organic amendments tighten nitrogen cycling in agricultural soils: a meta-analysis on gross nitrogen flux’, Frontiers in Agronomy, 2025, 7:1472749, doi:10.3389/fagro.2025.1472749.
  • 30
    SR Morey-Yagi, Y Kinoshita, K Motoki, Y Iwahashi, D D Hanh, S Kato, R Nakano, K Ochiai, M Kobayashi, T Nakazaki and K Numata, ‘Utilization of lysed and dried bacterial biomass from the marine purple photosynthetic bacterium Rhodovulum sulfidophilum as a sustainable nitrogen fertilizer for plant production’, Sustainable Agriculture, 2024, 2(1):10, doi:10.1038/s44264-024-00018-0.
  • 31
    RL Mulvaney, SA Khan and TR Ellsworth, ‘Synthetic Nitrogen Fertilizers Deplete Soil Nitrogen: A Global Dilemma for Sustainable Cereal Production’, Journal of Environmental Quality, 2009, 38(6):2295–2314, doi:10.2134/jeq2008.0527.